Main Article Headline |
New powers could give councils more say over betting shops, vape stores and gaming venues.But changing the shopfronts is not the same as changing the city centre. |

Peterborough has been promised more control over the businesses appearing on its high streets.
The aim is to tackle clusters of betting shops, vape stores and adult gaming centres.
Could that make the city centre feel more welcoming?
Yes, possibly. But no one should pretend that refusing one more betting shop will suddenly fill the Queensgate cafés or bring back every empty unit.
The Government says councils will get new tools to manage the concentration of these businesses, rather than simply banning legal shops.
That includes Gambling Impact Assessments for gambling premises.
A separate retail licensing scheme for vape and nicotine-product sellers is planned, but the Government says consultation is not expected until 2027.
Some stronger closure powers still need consultation and secondary legislation.
So this is not a fully operational Peterborough crackdown yet.
The city already has some local control.
Peterborough’s draft Local Plan includes rules aimed at preventing too many adult gaming centres, betting shops and similar uses gathering in one area.
Planning records show adult gaming-centre applications were refused at Units 6, Hereward Cross Shopping Centre, in April 2025 and at 28-30 Bridge Street in May 2024.
But the picture is not simply “gambling businesses out”.
A change of use for a betting shop at 25 Ortongate Shopping Centre was approved in October 2025.
The council’s gambling register also records recent premises licences, including one for S & D Bookmakers and one for Little Vegas.
That is the real local issue.
Local decisions can shape what opens next, but they do not erase existing permissions or create a better use for an empty unit.
A shuttered betting shop is still a shuttered shop unless someone wants to take the space on.
There is a separate case for enforcement.
In a 2025 Trading Standards operation, two Peterborough stores sold vapes to under-18 test purchasers, while five refused.
That supports tougher action against illegal sales. It does not, by itself, prove that every vape shop is damaging the city centre.
And even a tidier mix of businesses cannot fix expensive parking, concerns about safety, weak transport links, high rents or a thin retail offer.
Those are different problems, with different answers.
The fair test will come later: do restrictions reduce the overall number of these premises, or do they push them along to another street or nearby settlement?
Do alternative businesses move in? Do people stay longer and feel more comfortable?
Peterborough should use the powers carefully.
A high street needs more than fewer betting signs. It needs places people have a reason to visit.
What would make you choose Peterborough city centre more often: different shops, cheaper parking, better food and leisure, improved safety, or something else?
Tell us the specific change you would notice first. |

0 Comments
Join the conversation
Be the first to comment
Share your thoughts above.